Opinion

Who’s the boss? Angela Casey, managing director of CM Porter Novelli, Edinburgh, talks about the value of the right job title

Date: 12 November 2010 10:31
  
Stay in touch with PRmoment.com

Do all job titles mean the same thing?

I sometimes wonder what a vice president is in the US – it would appear to apply to a wide range of staff and skill levels and it sounds hugely impressive. Similarly, in the UK, there is a growing trend to call a divisional director a managing director. In the personal finance industry an organisation sometimes has about 10 MDs – each for a different division. I find it very confusing and wonder what happens if they turn up at the same event. Which one’s the real MD then?

Some years ago Porter Novelli made the move to simplify job titles and we created a flatter structure with just consultants, senior consultants and directors. While that worked for me and other directors and certainly saved on printing new business cards after each promotion, it offered younger people less of a structure within which to rise and as it did not fit the industry standard, I was never sure what it meant externally. I fully appreciate that young people want a sense of progression and a scale of job titles offers that. Furthermore, when you are in your 20s and in the pub you want your job title to mean something when you say what you do. Also, when people move around the industry (and I, of course, hope our good staff won’t!), you want your new employer to understand your skills level. This increases the importance of using job titles and commensurate pay levels that are relatively standard within the industry and that appeal to young people who want to know they are progressing.

Now it was easy for me to introduce simplified job titles because I already had a nice job title and have had it for many years (no expensive printing bills for me), but I appreciate aspiration and want to reward staff with both a sense of progression and status. Which is why, in the end, we reverted to industry standards and now offer a range of levels for younger staff to progress through which further helps them understand where they are going.

So from the management perspective, it means providing staff with a ladder for them to climb. Here are some thoughts on the best ways for PR people to use those levels and benefit from them in achieving career aspirations.

Look at the career structure within your organisation as a map and set yourself goals in time terms for when you want to reach the next level. Do not be frightened to share your ambitions and plans at your appraisal. Ask your boss whether your ambition is achievable and what you need to do to reach the next level within your target timescale (but be realistic). It is also not a bad idea to ask about the level after that too. By demonstrating you understand there is a career structure within your organisation that you see yourself within, it confirms your loyalty and commitment to making an impact and being part of the business for the long term.

You can also use job titles to distinguish behaviours and skill levels required as you move upwards. It is always a good idea to look objectively at your colleagues who are currently where you want to be – not to knock them off their spot, but rather to see how they behave, what they say in meetings and what skills they bring to their job. These are the things you need to acquire to reach the next stage and it also does no harm to read the job description for levels above yours. Then, take the time to think about what you need to get there in terms of training, skills acquisition and learning on the job. This can all be plotted on your virtual map and added to your personal plan for success and discussed, of course, at your appraisal.

In the end, whatever you think about your current role or even your job title, your career is up to you and it is up to you how you map it and direct it. Structure and success are important, as are taking time to make plans and research industry pay scales and skill levels. It’s in your hands.

Enjoyed this article? Click here to read more Opinion features

Share this article


Stay in touch with PRmoment.com

Comments

Whilst I need to preface this by saying that we don't employ junior people at DMG so our staffing profile is different from many agencies I couldn't disagree more I'm afraid. In my experience titles lead to internal politics and jealousy. I personally much rather focus on giving staff responsibility, a rewarding job and an attractive pay scale from the start, so that all they need to worry about is looking after clients. Everyone here is a ‘lead’ on at least one campaign so that everyone feels they have a direct impact on the bottom line, which in my experience at other agencies ‘account execs’ never do.

Name: Martin Brindley
www.daviesmurphy.com
Date: 16 Nov 2010 01:00 PM

Totally agree with what Angela says. It one point in Porter Novelli I was an Associate DIrector. Frankly, I was confused about what exactly that was...and I didn't get a particularly clear answer. Progression through relatively major milestones - consultant, senior consultant (or account manager) and account director give people specific and meaningful targets, and promote a strong career structure. It might take longer to get to the next step up a steeper ladder, but boy it's worth it! I hope eventually to be part-time in my own agency. In other words, Chairman

Name: Paul Murricane
www.axismediagroup.co.uk
Date: 16 Nov 2010 01:05 PM

There are two aspects here that jump out at me. First - job titles. These largely only matter to people when there is some sense of hierarchy or status involved in different choice of language. Titles are definitely used for political purposes - at present, as in the 1990s, we have a case of job title inflation. Where rather than a pay rise or other increased benefit, the "head of..." or similar notion of progression is used for feel good purposes. The second issue is much more important - the idea of ladders. This reflects a perspective of careers evident in more rigid industries / professions or indeed, the organisationally-focused career routes of the past. Few people today follow a consistently "upward" path as implied by the notion of a ladder or levels. Indeed, the concept is limiting and reflects a battleground where only the fittest will survive, not a world where we need to maximise talent (whether our own or that of others). Angela uses the term "map" which is more realistic as careers are more about flexibility and exploration today, with changes in direction, a need for continuous development (rather than a acquiring a fixed series of skills sets) and decisions that increasingly relate to personal circumstances. Where you go on the map is much more individual and diverse than the concept of a ladder to climb reflects. It is futile to consider progress in terms of reaching pre-determined milestones or necessitating a "strong career structure". Paul - if you wish to achieve your career ambitions, please don't focus on climbing artificial rungs on a ladder - forge your own path, develop your own competencies, manage your own reputation and make your dreams of being Chairman (or whatever the title actually means in concrete terms) a reality.

Name: Heather Yaxley
www.greenbanana.wordpresscom
Date: 17 Nov 2010 10:28 AM

Post a Comment
Name Comments
Website
Email
Tick to receive comment notifications for this article  

Enter the words above: